· Robotics · 3 min read
Understanding Numerical Inverse Kinematics: A Simple Guide
Numerical inverse kinematics can iteratively solve for joint angles to reach a desired end-effector position using gradient descent with the Jacobian pseudo-inverse, suitable for planar manipulators and more complex robotic arms.
Introduction
Numerical inverse kinematics is a powerful method to compute joint configurations that bring the robot’s end-effector to a desired position when analytical solutions are difficult. By leveraging the Jacobian matrix and iterative updates, the algorithm minimizes the difference between the current and target end-effector positions using a gradient descent-like approach. This method can handle singularities and is adaptable to more complex kinematic chains.
Forward Kinematics
Forward kinematics maps joint angles to an end-effector position. For a planar arm with two serially connected links of lengths and and joint angles and :
This provides the current end-effector position, which is compared to the target.
Jacobian Matrix
The Jacobian describes how small changes in joint angles affect the end-effector’s position:
It is used to translate position errors into joint angle updates.
Loss Function and Gradient
The error vector is defined as:
The squared norm of this vector serves as a loss function:
Gradient descent updates the joint angles proportionally to the Jacobian pseudo-inverse multiplied by the error:
Where is the pseudo-inverse of the Jacobian and is the learning rate.
Algorithm Workflow
Initialize: Start with an initial guess for the joint angles.
Iterative Update:
- Compute current end-effector position via forward kinematics.
- Calculate the error vector and loss.
- Compute the Jacobian and its pseudo-inverse.
- Update joint angles using .
Convergence: Stop when the error norm is below a threshold or after a maximum number of iterations.
Example Implementation in Python
import numpy as np
# Forward kinematics
def forward_kinematics(q, L1, L2):
x = L1 * np.cos(q[0]) + L2 * np.cos(q[0] + q[1])
y = L1 * np.sin(q[0]) + L2 * np.sin(q[0] + q[1])
return np.array([x, y])
# Jacobian computation
def jacobian(q, L1, L2):
J11 = -L1 * np.sin(q[0]) - L2 * np.sin(q[0] + q[1])
J12 = -L2 * np.sin(q[0] + q[1])
J21 = L1 * np.cos(q[0]) + L2 * np.cos(q[0] + q[1])
J22 = L2 * np.cos(q[0] + q[1])
return np.array([[J11, J12], [J21, J22]])
# Numerical inverse kinematics
def inverse_kinematics_jacobian(target_pos, initial_q, L1, L2, max_iterations=1000, tolerance=1e-4, learning_rate=0.1):
q = np.array(initial_q, dtype=float)
for i in range(max_iterations):
current_pos = forward_kinematics(q, L1, L2)
error = target_pos - current_pos
if np.linalg.norm(error) < tolerance:
print(f"Converged in {i} iterations.")
return q
J = jacobian(q, L1, L2)
J_pseudo_inverse = np.linalg.pinv(J)
q += learning_rate * np.dot(J_pseudo_inverse, error)
print("Did not converge within maximum iterations.")
return qPractical Insights
- Using the Jacobian pseudo-inverse allows the algorithm to handle singular configurations gracefully.
- Proper initialization of joint angles and tuning the learning rate are essential for convergence.
- The method generalizes to manipulators with more degrees of freedom and more complex kinematic chains.
- This approach is particularly useful when analytical solutions are unavailable or cumbersome to derive.